|
|
Post by Pattycakes on Feb 6, 2009 12:05:28 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Simba on Feb 6, 2009 12:15:12 GMT -5
It's fake. Neither Leaky or MuggleNet have reported it so I'll go with fake  Don't worry, man, she'll study as close to Rupeykins as possible ;] |
|
|
|
Post by empertgrinson on Feb 6, 2009 13:25:28 GMT -5
I wont trust anything until her EMS says so, lol
|
|
|
|
Post by suzeeq on Feb 6, 2009 18:23:55 GMT -5
I wont trust anything until her EMS says so, lol Yep, I agree with you. |
|
|
|
Post by circe on Feb 28, 2009 22:08:56 GMT -5
www.thebrownnoser.com/home/index.cfm?event=displayArticle&ustory_id=dc252af7-db98-43e3-81b8-c8e5b276dd1eEmma Watson: CorrectionsJamie Brew Issue date: 2/27/09 Section: Opinion In December the Brown Noser published a profile of then-prospective-Brown-freshman Emma Watson. Since then, additional information has come to light that called to our attention several factual inaccuracies in the December article. We at the Noser think nothing more important than the public's right to accurate news coverage, and what follows are the corrections of said inaccuracies found in said article. 1. The headline of the article presented Ms. Watson as a "Student, Actress, Caring Person." Please note that where 'caring person' should be removed from this title, 'traitor' may be appended. 2. The December article stated that students who had a chance to meet Ms. Watson as she visited campus were struck by "how normal she seemed," reflecting the fact that even though she is a celebrity, she is really just like any of us. In actuality this is probably a reflection of the great lengths to which Ms. Watson goes to appear human and to seem like she cares about us, when really she only wants to lead us all on and cruelly break our hearts. 3. In the fourth paragraph, it was suggested that "students may look forward not only to hearing Emma's stories of life as a big-time actress, but also to the intellectual stimulation and energy she will contribute to the Brown community." Obviously, Brown students can no longer look forward to either of these things because she isn't coming ever. Not ever. Moreover, it is doubtful that she would even have contributed anything anyway due to the fact that she is a soulless Cambridge-loving whore no college would even want in the first place. 4. Ms. Watson's birthday was listed in the original article as March 15, 1990. The actual date was April 15, while the year turns out to be so far in the past that Ms. Watson is exactly as old as Hell itself. 5. One line in the article claimed that "at heart, however, Emma is an actress." This is an error, as Ms. Watson has no heart. 6. The profile listed some of Ms. Watson's activities, including tennis, fashion design, and fly fishing. However, it also neglected to include her favorite activity: destroying the lives of people who try and try to please her but she doesn't even notice because she thinks she's so amazing and can just do whatever she wants without even thinking about my feelings. I hate you, Emma Watson! You never meant anything to me, and even if it seemed like I cared, rest assured that I never did, you b**ch! It's always the most beautiful people who have the most empty and remorseless souls within. 7. Earlier in this series of corrections, this writer may have expressed some feelings that he didn't actually mean. And as he sits here in his dorm room, alone at 9 o'clock on a Saturday night, he realizes that he could just hold down backspace on his keyboard for a minute and all this would go away. But what's said is said, and Ms. Watson has the right to know how he feels. Even if it means they can never be together.
|
|
|
|
Post by circe on Feb 28, 2009 22:12:34 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by ~Katie~ on Feb 28, 2009 22:41:04 GMT -5
www.thebrownnoser.com/home/index.cfm?event=displayArticle&ustory_id=dc252af7-db98-43e3-81b8-c8e5b276dd1eEmma Watson: CorrectionsJamie Brew Issue date: 2/27/09 Section: Opinion In December the Brown Noser published a profile of then-prospective-Brown-freshman Emma Watson. Since then, additional information has come to light that called to our attention several factual inaccuracies in the December article. We at the Noser think nothing more important than the public's right to accurate news coverage, and what follows are the corrections of said inaccuracies found in said article. 1. The headline of the article presented Ms. Watson as a "Student, Actress, Caring Person." Please note that where 'caring person' should be removed from this title, 'traitor' may be appended. 2. The December article stated that students who had a chance to meet Ms. Watson as she visited campus were struck by "how normal she seemed," reflecting the fact that even though she is a celebrity, she is really just like any of us. In actuality this is probably a reflection of the great lengths to which Ms. Watson goes to appear human and to seem like she cares about us, when really she only wants to lead us all on and cruelly break our hearts. 3. In the fourth paragraph, it was suggested that "students may look forward not only to hearing Emma's stories of life as a big-time actress, but also to the intellectual stimulation and energy she will contribute to the Brown community." Obviously, Brown students can no longer look forward to either of these things because she isn't coming ever. Not ever. Moreover, it is doubtful that she would even have contributed anything anyway due to the fact that she is a soulless Cambridge-loving whore no college would even want in the first place. 4. Ms. Watson's birthday was listed in the original article as March 15, 1990. The actual date was April 15, while the year turns out to be so far in the past that Ms. Watson is exactly as old as Hell itself. 5. One line in the article claimed that "at heart, however, Emma is an actress." This is an error, as Ms. Watson has no heart. 6. The profile listed some of Ms. Watson's activities, including tennis, fashion design, and fly fishing. However, it also neglected to include her favorite activity: destroying the lives of people who try and try to please her but she doesn't even notice because she thinks she's so amazing and can just do whatever she wants without even thinking about my feelings. I hate you, Emma Watson! You never meant anything to me, and even if it seemed like I cared, rest assured that I never did, you b**ch! It's always the most beautiful people who have the most empty and remorseless souls within. 7. Earlier in this series of corrections, this writer may have expressed some feelings that he didn't actually mean. And as he sits here in his dorm room, alone at 9 o'clock on a Saturday night, he realizes that he could just hold down backspace on his keyboard for a minute and all this would go away. But what's said is said, and Ms. Watson has the right to know how he feels. Even if it means they can never be together.  When will it stop? |
|
|
|
Post by millas on Mar 1, 2009 5:54:17 GMT -5
^ I don't get this article. Was it meant as a joke or what..? Well it was funny as hell. I think.lol
|
|
|
|
Post by Vern on Mar 1, 2009 6:36:42 GMT -5
I think it's meant to be not taken seriously.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lu on Mar 1, 2009 6:47:52 GMT -5
www.thebrownnoser.com/home/index.cfm?event=displayArticle&ustory_id=dc252af7-db98-43e3-81b8-c8e5b276dd1eEmma Watson: CorrectionsJamie Brew Issue date: 2/27/09 Section: Opinion In December the Brown Noser published a profile of then-prospective-Brown-freshman Emma Watson. Since then, additional information has come to light that called to our attention several factual inaccuracies in the December article. We at the Noser think nothing more important than the public's right to accurate news coverage, and what follows are the corrections of said inaccuracies found in said article. 1. The headline of the article presented Ms. Watson as a "Student, Actress, Caring Person." Please note that where 'caring person' should be removed from this title, 'traitor' may be appended. 2. The December article stated that students who had a chance to meet Ms. Watson as she visited campus were struck by "how normal she seemed," reflecting the fact that even though she is a celebrity, she is really just like any of us. In actuality this is probably a reflection of the great lengths to which Ms. Watson goes to appear human and to seem like she cares about us, when really she only wants to lead us all on and cruelly break our hearts. 3. In the fourth paragraph, it was suggested that "students may look forward not only to hearing Emma's stories of life as a big-time actress, but also to the intellectual stimulation and energy she will contribute to the Brown community." Obviously, Brown students can no longer look forward to either of these things because she isn't coming ever. Not ever. Moreover, it is doubtful that she would even have contributed anything anyway due to the fact that she is a soulless Cambridge-loving whore no college would even want in the first place. 4. Ms. Watson's birthday was listed in the original article as March 15, 1990. The actual date was April 15, while the year turns out to be so far in the past that Ms. Watson is exactly as old as Hell itself. 5. One line in the article claimed that "at heart, however, Emma is an actress." This is an error, as Ms. Watson has no heart. 6. The profile listed some of Ms. Watson's activities, including tennis, fashion design, and fly fishing. However, it also neglected to include her favorite activity: destroying the lives of people who try and try to please her but she doesn't even notice because she thinks she's so amazing and can just do whatever she wants without even thinking about my feelings. I hate you, Emma Watson! You never meant anything to me, and even if it seemed like I cared, rest assured that I never did, you b**ch! It's always the most beautiful people who have the most empty and remorseless souls within. 7. Earlier in this series of corrections, this writer may have expressed some feelings that he didn't actually mean. And as he sits here in his dorm room, alone at 9 o'clock on a Saturday night, he realizes that he could just hold down backspace on his keyboard for a minute and all this would go away. But what's said is said, and Ms. Watson has the right to know how he feels. Even if it means they can never be together. I'm going to take this as a joke...  If it's not, I worry for this guy. Infatuation, much? |
|
Don't worry, man, she'll study as close to Rupeykins as possible ;]
(