|
Post by Chris on Apr 21, 2008 21:32:48 GMT -5
Chris, how old are you? Tell me why you're asking first ...
|
|
|
Post by Valerie ☆ on Apr 21, 2008 21:34:07 GMT -5
HE IS 16!! sorry.
|
|
|
Post by Chris on Apr 21, 2008 21:35:29 GMT -5
Thanks, Val. Knew I could count on you.
|
|
|
Post by Natalie ♥ on Apr 21, 2008 21:35:33 GMT -5
gosh, Val. All up in his busy-nuss.
|
|
|
Post by Valerie ☆ on Apr 21, 2008 21:38:36 GMT -5
Can't help it. I just ate Oreos.
|
|
|
Post by Chris on Apr 21, 2008 21:43:44 GMT -5
My teeth hurt right now so I don't envy you. Haha.
|
|
|
Post by Natalie ♥ on Apr 21, 2008 21:48:08 GMT -5
Can't help it. I just ate Oreos. Uh oh Orea. goodbye my lovelies. I shall talk to you tomorrow.
|
|
|
Post by Valerie ☆ on Apr 21, 2008 21:48:53 GMT -5
Bye bye!
|
|
|
Post by Chris on Apr 21, 2008 21:57:24 GMT -5
Woops. Goodbye, Nataliie!
|
|
ks987
Junior Member
Posts: 136
|
Post by ks987 on Apr 22, 2008 8:31:11 GMT -5
That tabloid was incredibly stupid.
They once again made it sound like Emma intended for the world to see that and did that on purpose. It is bad enough that a pap did that, but it is even worse how she is being portrayed as a another "wild child" who wants publicity and attention. **** the person who wrote that article. How dare they accuse Emma of that? When has she EVER done something like that?
This Miley girl has been doing this for a while, so I can understand why they are targeting her to an extent. They are still not right though.
But they tried to paint Emma as worse than Miley by saying "She obviously did this intentionally and is a huge ****" I guess they need to tell themselves that whenever they do such horrible things to celebs.
|
|